Skip to content
The Enginev1

Enrollment programs

DEMO-29 — Lapse by Design: Opportunity Closes Without Required Action

Authored demonstration. Not a live employer result.

01 · Situation

A time-boxed enrollment opportunity closes at its stated window end. The governing terms explicitly treat non-response at window-close as automatic closure, not failure by any party.

Illustrative enrollment-program terms, obligating the responsible party to present the offer and keep it open through a stated 30-day window, and explicitly stating that non-response at window-close results in automatic lapse — not cancellation, refusal, or a participant failure finding.

02 · Evidence

What the record holds.

  1. E1Enrollment-program terms, naming the presenting party's obligation and the automatic-lapse rule

    Verified · on file

  2. E2Offer presented to the participant, documented

    Verified · Day 0

  3. E3Option-availability system reviewed through Day 30; the offer remained open and accessible for the full window

    Verified · Day 30

  4. E4Enrollment system: no participant action recorded through Day 30; opportunity status shows "lapsed," per the automatic rule in E1

    Verified · Day 30

03 · Obligations / Owners

The chain of responsibility.

  1. 01

    Presenting party (present the offer and maintain the option through the window, per E1) — fulfilled per E2/E3. No obligation is assigned to the participant by E1.

04 · Event Type

The classification of the event.

ExecutionClaimed — E2 and E3 claim that the offer was presented and maintained through the required window. EvidenceAttached — E2–E4 are attached. VerificationCompleted — the presenting party's performance and the opportunity's recorded disposition are evaluated against E1. EventObserved — E4 records the opportunity's system status as "lapsed."

05 · Verification Result

What verification established.

Presenting party's obligation: SUPPORTED. Automatic lapse disposition: SUPPORTED. The participant's inactivity is not itself a verification finding.

06 · Projection

What the evidence implies ahead.

Presenting party's obligation fulfilled. The opportunity lapsed automatically under the governing terms at window-close. No cancellation, refusal, or participant failure is inferred — lapse is the intended disposition the terms themselves describe.

07 · Next Action

The corrective obligation.

None — this is the terms' designed outcome, not a break.

08 · Economic Boundary

Where the evidence stops.

Not applicable.

09 · Engine Answer

What the Engine can and cannot establish.

E1 obligated the presenting party to offer and keep the option open for 30 days, and separately states that non-response at window-close is an automatic lapse, not a failure by anyone. E2 and E3 support that the party fulfilled its obligation — the offer was presented and remained available the full window. E4 shows no participant action, and the system itself records the resulting status as "lapsed," exactly as the terms describe. The Engine can demonstrate that the presenting party's obligation was fulfilled and that the opportunity's own designed disposition — lapse — occurred as the terms intended. This is not a cancellation, a refusal, or a finding against the participant.

Fulfilled by the presenting party. Lapsed by design. Neither is a failure.

10 · What Remains Unknown

Outside the Engine's reach.

Why the participant did not respond; this record does not require or supply a reason.