Care coordination
DEMO-32 — Action Occurred, Discharge of Assigned Obligation Unconfirmed
Authored demonstration. Not a live employer result.
01 · Situation
A required action is performed and documented by a party other than the one the governing artifact assigned the obligation to. The governing artifact does not state who may satisfy the obligation.
Illustrative care-coordination protocol, assigning this specific follow-up call to the assigned care coordinator by name, with defined closure conditions for the call itself — but silent on whether performance by anyone else satisfies the obligation.
02 · Evidence
What the record holds.
- E1Protocol assigning the call to the named care coordinator, with closure conditions for the call
Verified · on file
- E2Call log showing the required call was made and meets the stated closure conditions, performed by a different staff member, not the assigned coordinator
Verified · Day 1
- E3Protocol repository reviewed for any statement on substitute performers; none found
Verified · Day 1
03 · Obligations / Owners
The chain of responsibility.
- 01
Named care coordinator (assigned owner, per E1). The staff member who performed the call was not authorized or prohibited by any reviewed artifact — standing to satisfy the assigned obligation is simply not addressed.
04 · Event Type
The classification of the event.
ExecutionClaimed — E2 claims the required call occurred. EvidenceAttached — E1–E3 are attached. VerificationCompleted — the action and the performer's standing to discharge the assigned obligation are evaluated separately.
05 · Verification Result
What verification established.
The required action: SUPPORTED. Whether it discharged the named owner's obligation: INSUFFICIENT.
06 · Projection
What the evidence implies ahead.
The required action demonstrably occurred, but whether that performance discharged the assigned coordinator's obligation is not established.
07 · Next Action
The corrective obligation.
The protocol should be amended to state explicitly whether performance by anyone other than the assigned owner satisfies the obligation.
08 · Economic Boundary
Where the evidence stops.
Not established.
09 · Engine Answer
What the Engine can and cannot establish.
E1 assigned this call to a named coordinator and set closure conditions for the call itself. E2 shows the call was made and meets those conditions — performed by a different staff member. Neither E1 nor any other reviewed artifact states whether performance by someone other than the assigned owner satisfies the obligation. The Engine can demonstrate that the required action occurred. It cannot establish that this discharged the assigned coordinator's obligation, since standing to perform it was never addressed one way or the other — not confirmed, and not disproven either.
The call happened. Whether it counted is a question the protocol never answered.
10 · What Remains Unknown
Outside the Engine's reach.
Whether an informal handoff occurred; whether the assigned coordinator was aware the call was made by someone else.